Entries Tagged as 'Best of'

USGS issues new Geothermal Assessment - Washington State has 30,000 MW potential of EGS

In the first comprehensive assessment since 1978, the US Geologic Survey has issued a new survey of the hydrothermal and EGS potential of the Western United States.  Building from recent assessments by the Western Governors Association, State Geologic Surveys, private data and federal assessment they issue conservative, mean and low probability estimates.  The study included resources greater than 90 degrees C and up to a depth of 6km.  Pristine lands and lands proximal to National Parks were excluded.  A total of 241 geothermal sites were identified.

 

Washington State’s identified resources are 0.25% of the national assessment and expand to 1.25% of the potential when EGS is included.

SnoPud Geothermal Workshop a Success

Over 65 participants attended the Geothermal Workshop for utilities hosted by Snohomish PUD in Everett last week.  During the day and a half event on both power generation and ground source heat pumps the focus was on the state of the industry and the opportunities now for advancing geothermal in Washington State.

The two most important Washington State specific geothermal findings were SnoPud’s  goal of 90 MW from Geothermal in the Cascades by 2020 and the estimate by the National Geothermal Resources Council that Washington State’s geothermal potential could be double previous estimates and exceed 600 MW.

The event was opened by SnoPud Director Steve Klein and Congressman Jay Inslee (via recorded video).  Congressman Inslee, whose district includes part of the service district of SnoPud, talked about making Washington State a geothermal leader and was looking forward to "cut(ting) the ribbon on the first plant" .  Congressman Inslee has also arranged for $500K in funding to assist SnoPud in developing their geothermal plan.

However, the state faces a significant challenge as resource estimates are from a 1979 study.  "Comprehensive research and exploration have not been done (in Washington State)" according to GRC Executive Director Curt Robinson.  And yet, he felt confident enough to cast an estimate of 600 MW, primarily in the Cascades and Central Washington. 

Western Washington’s geothermal potential remains unknown and is largely masked by the rainfall on the western slopes of the Cascades.  Experts still feel that several sites may exist along the I-5 transmission corridor, a critical factor in the siting of any geothermal plant.

Development costs have soared in recent months as capital, material and exploration costs have significantly spiked. Guy Nelson with the Geothermal Working Group stated that the current rule of thumb is now $4 Million per MW.  Geothermal power can range from 6.6 to 11.6 cents per kiloWatt hour.

Rural PUD’s also learned about the new loan assistance program by the USDA for ground source heat pumps.  This program offers a great opportunity for Eastern Washington utilities to help homeowners install and finance home heat pumps that are critical for utilities interested in peak shaving, and homeowners interested in significantly reducing their home heating and cooling costs.

Representatives from Seattle City Light, Tacoma Power and Skamania PUD were in attendance, as was State Senator Adam Kline.  Senator Kline is talking to Senate leadership about introducing the Geothermal Study Bill again this year.   He is confident that a straight forward study bill (no policy, regulations, funding or taxes) that explores both power generation and heat pumps will garner strong interest by legislators throughout the state. 

Brownbag Presentation by Susan Petty

Susan Petty Power PresentationAttached here is the large power point presentation given by Susan Petty at the Geothermal Brownbag.  This presentation was presented by her a week earlier to former Vice President Al Gore. 

Geothermal Study Bill - Washington State Legislature

Senator Adam Kline (D, 37th District South Seattle) has introduced a study bill on geothermal.  The bill has not received a hearing at this time.

AN ACT Relating to assessing the state’s geothermal resources for electrical power production; and creating new sections.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION. Sec. 1) (1) The legislature finds that the Pacific Northwest has unique geological features that include significant geothermal resources, and that other states and provinces in this region are actively exploring and developing these resources for energy production purposes. The legislature further finds that existing data and analyses of these resources is now largely outdated and that advances in technology, increased energy prices, and increased interest in low-carbon energy sources has increased interest by electric utilities and independent power producers in the state’s geothermal resources.

(2) The legislature therefore intends to authorize a comprehensive review of the state’s geothermal resources and make recommendations regarding policy measures to facilitate environmentally responsible development of these resources for electric generation and concentrated heating purposes.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 2) (1) The geothermal resource assessment committee is created.

(2) The committee is composed of the following members:

(a) The commissioner of public lands, or the commissioner’s designee;

(b) The energy policy division of the department of community, trade, and economic development;

(c) The chair of the energy facility site evaluation council;

(d) The state geologist within the department of natural resources;

(e) The chair of the utilities and transportation commission;

(f) Representatives of publicly owned and privately owned utilities;

(g) Representatives of independent power producers;

(h) Representatives of geologists from academic, research, and private sectors;

(i) Representatives of other interested sectors, including agriculture, forestry, and environmental;

(j) Representatives of tribal governments with significant geothermal resource interests; and

(k) Representatives of federal agencies with regulatory or land management responsibilities relating to the development of geothermal interests.

(3) The commissioner of public lands, or the commissioner’s designee, shall chair the committee. The commissioner of public lands shall select the committee members described in subsection (2)(f) through (k) of this section.

(4) The department of natural resources shall provide necessary staff and administrative support to the committee.

(5) The committee shall conduct a comprehensive assessment of the geothermal resources in the state and their potential for environmentally responsible development for power production purposes. The assessment must include at least the following:

(a) A characterization of the geothermal resources in the state and the potential for development for electrical generation and concentrated heating purposes based upon currently employed and projected technologies;

(b) The economic implications of this development potential, including community economic development, job creation, and state and local revenue benefits, including an assessment for each county in the state;

(c) A review of current lease payments on federal lands in the state for geothermal leasing, described by county;

(d) A review of state lands with geothermal development potential;

(e) A review of the effect of the state’s water resource laws and policies on the development of geothermal resources; and

(f) Recommendations for legislative and administrative actions based upon this assessment to encourage environmentally responsible geothermal resource development in the state.

(6) The committee shall provide the assessment and recommendations to the energy and fiscal committees of the senate and house of representatives by December 1, 2008.

Seattle Times Op/Ed

Friday, January 4th, 2008 Seattle Times Op/ED. 

The link to The Seattle Times Op/ED on their editorial page is here

The following is modified from the op/ed

The United States is frequently embarrassed over its energy policy.  The most recent occurrence was in the area of geothermal energy. Last fall, the Senate’s Energy and Natural Resource Committee sat through one of the best presentations on our nation’s geothermal energy potential. It was delivered by the president of Iceland.

He spoke to the expansion of geothermal energy in the western United States. That expansion is coming to Washington state. Our location on the edge of a regional “hot zone,” along with the accelerating interest in all forms of renewable energy, means that developers soon will be knocking at our doors.

Underground windmills, heat mining and enhanced geothermal systems are all names and references for geothermal energy. Instead of digging or drilling for gas or coal to burn and generate steam in order to turn a turbine, you tap the Earth’s natural heat to create energy. It works. And, it works today.

Power engineers consider it a mature technology — a demonstrated one — and most of the technology, though 20 years old, is available today off the shelf. Utilities show keen interest in it because it is steady, not intermittent like wind and solar. However, like those two energy sources, geothermal is renewable. It has high initial costs, roughly two-thirds coming from drilling. But, once built, it has no fuel costs.

The hot zone of California, Nevada (the Saudi Arabia of geothermal), Idaho and Oregon could produce tens of thousands of megawatts along the spine of the Sierra Nevadas and Cascades. Washington state sits on the edge of this hot zone. The 34 thermal hot springs throughout the state are just the surface of our potential.Yet, Washington state has zero megawatts of geothermal. “It also has zero planned, proposed or within the plant approval process, even though we have excellent potential,” laments Susan Petty, one of the world’s leading geothermal reservoir engineers. However, there is now news of International Paper assessing their geothermal potential with a partner.

Petty, who is based in Seattle, points out there is no current hard data on the exact nature of the state’s geothermal resources. But, working off 25-year-old geologic studies, it’s reasonable to say we are among the top 10 states.

Petty also notes Washington state is unprepared to respond or assist if a geothermal development permit were submitted today. This is major oversight that must be addressed.

Gov. Christine Gregoire is committed to renewable energy, but faced strong opposition over the Horizon wind farm outside of Ellensburg because of its size and profile. That would not be an issue with geothermal: It has the smallest surface footprint among renewable forms of energy; less space than the Seattle Center grounds would be needed to produce the energy equivalent of 65 wind turbines along the ridge line in Kittitas County.

Geothermal in Washington state also would generate solid, respected jobs in parts of the state that are seeking to expand their employment bases. The 1993 Whatcom County Report calculates 124 jobs in eastern Whatcom county.

Yet, we must not mislead ourselves into thinking geothermal is a clean and limitless energy (we did that with nuclear power in the 1950s). There are impacts. Water issues are the biggest concern, especially if developers work on the cheap and do not have the proper recovery technology. Carbon dioxide is produced, but the impacts are one-fifteenth to one-thirtieth that of natural gas, the cleanest of the abundant fuel sources currently in our portfolio.

If geothermal is done correctly and respectfully — no development on sacred sites or in wilderness areas and national parks — we can bring hundreds of megawatts online in Washington state. The discussion needs to begin now with the tribes, utilities, environmentalists and state agencies.

It is time for Washington state to recognize the great potential for what is being called “the forgotten renewable.” The underground windmills are waiting.

BPA Study; 124 Whatcom County Geothermal Jobs

This 1992 Report, funded by the Bonneville Power Administration, identified 124 jobs if a modest  (100MWe) geothermal power plant was developed on the eastern side of Mt. Baker in Whatcom County. 62 direct plant jobs!image imageLastly, an additional $9.4 million in related income to the county, plus royalty, ongoing O & M and property taxes reaching $14 Million a year at its peak.image These numbers are 15 years old but basic leasing and taxing regulations have not.  Revenue back to the local community from federal land holding lease receipts is a higher percentage because of the resource extraction aspect. 

Glitnir: US Geothermal Report

In September 2007, Glitnir of Iceland unveiled their U.S. Geothermal Initiative for $10Billion in investment.  The report is based largely on the Western Governor’s Assessment and Dept. of Energy Geopowering the West program.  For Washington state,image the report identifies the more common and lesser 50MW number.  The full Glitnir report is a great overview, and offers some clear market insight.  Though the state could have 4% from geothermal, there is no real activity statewide. Critical to the report is its assertions of low cost geothermal production. imageimageimageimage This final chart extracted from the MIT study reinforces the assertion that geothermal could meet 15-20% of the U.S. electrical needs by 2050.image

Geothermal Market Growth

From the Glitnir Report

image

Geothermal Air Emissions

From an article by staff at the Geothermal Energy Association.  The point of comparison was Average Power Plant Emissions according to EPA 2000.  Sulfur dioxide for geothermal is 1/10th of coal, but can be on par with natural gas.   (Click on the table to enlarge.)image The CO2 emissions numbers are interesting, showing the release of gases associated with the water.  They approach an order of magnitude of gas production. (10X less!) image

The 34 Thermal Hot Springs of Washington State

The 34 thermal springs in the state are listed in the Chart below. The Sherman Fumarole comes in at 266.  The data are extracted from the 1980 NOAA database, then referred to as the 30 Hot Springs of Washington State.  Note that the longitude and latitude are given, as well as the temperature in F and C.  Here is the NOAA website list of Washington State Thermal Springs:image

BAKER HOT SPRING

COLLINS HOT SPRINGS

DORR FUMAROLE FIELD

FISH HATCHERY WARM SPRING

GAMMA HOT SPRINGS

GARLAND MINERAL SPRINGS

GOLDMEYER HOT SPRINGS

GREEN RIVER SODA SPRING

HOT LAKEKENNEDY HOT SPRING

KLICKITAT MINERAL SPRINGS

LESTER HOT SPRINGS

LONGMIRE MINERAL SPRINGS

MOFFETTS (BONNEVILLE)

MOUNT ADAMS FUMAROLES

MT RAINIER FUMAROLES

MT ST HELENS FUMAROLES

OHANAPECOSH HOT SPRINGS

OLYMPIC HOT SPRINGS

ORR CREEK WARM SPRINGS

PACKWOOD HOT SPRING

POISON LAKE

ROCK CREEK HOT SPRINGS

SCENIC HOT SPRINGS

SHERMAN CRATER FUMAROLES

SIMCOE SODA SPRINGS

SOL DUC HOT SPRINGS

ST MARTINS HOT SPRINGS

SULPHUR CREEK HOT SPRINGS

WARM SPRINGS CANYON

North American Geothermal Map

Lower 48 Geothermal Map(click map to enlarge)This map outlines the geothermal potential of Washington state. The North American Geothermal Map was produced by the Southern Methodist University Geothermal Lab.  The databases are referred to as: the Western Geothermal Database and the U.S. Regional Database, SMU Geothermal Lab, Dallas, Texas.  Maria Richards, Database Manager, mrichard@smu.edu, 214-768-1975. See even more maps from SMU.  For a discussion on data.

The 1983 Geothermal Assessment of Washington State

The report is a compendium of numerous studies conducted over the decades leading up to the early 1980’s. image The full link to the report is here.  Most of the assessment is deep technical overviews with no major conclusions  or findings.  The report relies on numerous studies in the decades leading up to 1983. A status of the geothermal assessment was created in the included chart.  Other areas of interest are Mt. Baker and Wind River.  The Mt. Rainier, Mt. Adams and Mt. St. Helens were glossed over because of their National Park or Wilderness area designation.  image

Report: Geopowering the West

Geopowering the West is a January 2006 study issued by the Western Governor’s Association. It is the most comprehensive study on geothermal in the Western U.S. Washington pulls in at 50 MWe at five sites (though most analysis elsewhere is higher, this number has become the norm for the state). The report, presented here in full Geothermal-full.pdf characterizes the basis for California (2,500 MW), Nevada (1,500), Idaho (860 ) and Oregon (380). The next round of states that need analysis are Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. The conclusions of the Task Force include:

The western states share a capacity of almost 13,000 megawatts (MW) of geothermal energy that can be developed on specific sites within a reasonable timeframe (e.g., by 2025). Geothermal power plants, ranging from 10 to over 200 MW (depending on the resource), can supply enough electricity to meet the needs of 10,000 to 200,00 homes respectively.Of these, 5,600 MW are considered by the geothermal industry to be viable for commercial development within the next ten years; i.e., by about 2015. (To put this into perspective, the U.S. had 2,828 MW of geothermal power capacity on-line in 2005.) This is a commercially achievable capacity for new generation and does not include the much larger potential of unknown, undiscovered resources.

The 5,600 MW is estimated to be developable at busbar costs in a range of levelized costs of energy (LCOE) of about 5.3 to 7.9 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh).