Seattle Times Op/Ed
Friday, January 4th, 2008 Seattle Times Op/ED.
The link to The Seattle Times Op/ED on their editorial page is here
The following is modified from the op/ed
The United States is frequently embarrassed over its energy policy. 
The most recent occurrence was in the area of geothermal energy. Last fall, the Senate’s Energy and Natural Resource Committee sat through one of the best presentations on our nation’s geothermal energy potential. It was delivered by the president of Iceland.
He spoke to the expansion of geothermal energy in the western United States. That expansion is coming to Washington state. Our location on the edge of a regional “hot zone,” along with the accelerating interest in all forms of renewable energy, means that developers soon will be knocking at our doors.
Underground windmills, heat mining and enhanced geothermal systems are all names and references for geothermal energy. Instead of digging or drilling for gas or coal to burn and generate steam in order to turn a turbine, you tap the Earth’s natural heat to create energy. It works. And, it works today.
Power engineers consider it a mature technology — a demonstrated one — and most of the technology, though 20 years old, is available today off the shelf. Utilities show keen interest in it because it is steady, not intermittent like wind and solar. However, like those two energy sources, geothermal is renewable. It has high initial costs, roughly two-thirds coming from drilling. But, once built, it has no fuel costs.
The hot zone of California, Nevada (the Saudi Arabia of geothermal), Idaho and Oregon could produce tens of thousands of megawatts along the spine of the Sierra Nevadas and Cascades. Washington state sits on the edge of this hot zone. The 34 thermal hot springs throughout the state are just the surface of our potential.Yet, Washington state has zero megawatts of geothermal. “It also has zero planned, proposed or within the plant approval process, even though we have excellent potential,” laments Susan Petty, one of the world’s leading geothermal reservoir engineers. However, there is now news of International Paper assessing their geothermal potential with a partner.
Petty, who is based in Seattle, points out there is no current hard data on the exact nature of the state’s geothermal resources. But, working off 25-year-old geologic studies, it’s reasonable to say we are among the top 10 states.
Petty also notes Washington state is unprepared to respond or assist if a geothermal development permit were submitted today. This is major oversight that must be addressed.
Gov. Christine Gregoire is committed to renewable energy, but faced strong opposition over the Horizon wind farm outside of Ellensburg because of its size and profile. That would not be an issue with geothermal: It has the smallest surface footprint among renewable forms of energy; less space than the Seattle Center grounds would be needed to produce the energy equivalent of 65 wind turbines along the ridge line in Kittitas County.
Geothermal in Washington state also would generate solid, respected jobs in parts of the state that are seeking to expand their employment bases. The 1993 Whatcom County Report calculates 124 jobs in eastern Whatcom county.
Yet, we must not mislead ourselves into thinking geothermal is a clean and limitless energy (we did that with nuclear power in the 1950s). There are impacts. Water issues are the biggest concern, especially if developers work on the cheap and do not have the proper recovery technology. Carbon dioxide is produced, but the impacts are one-fifteenth to one-thirtieth that of natural gas, the cleanest of the abundant fuel sources currently in our portfolio.
If geothermal is done correctly and respectfully — no development on sacred sites or in wilderness areas and national parks — we can bring hundreds of megawatts online in Washington state. The discussion needs to begin now with the tribes, utilities, environmentalists and state agencies.
It is time for Washington state to recognize the great potential for what is being called “the forgotten renewable.” The underground windmills are waiting.
Who drew the outline of WA state hot spots for geothermal activitiy? How come it missed the hot springs at Sol Duc? Mount Baker (an active volcano last time I looked) Mt. Saint Helens?, Mt. Rainier? I see it at least it got Mt Adams..
While I’m all for keeping major power sources out of national parks, parks are consumers of electric power and having a small power plant to run the facilities would not be out of line.
Still it seems strange that Puget Power would be all hot and heavy for wind mills but not geothermal energy. Something must be up with the cost of extraction that this article is missing. (water table issues?) A private power company like Puget Power would want power at it’s cheapest with the least legal battles. Wind is being forced down their throats because water power is currently so cheap. GeoThermal would satisfy the same WA law so what’s wrong with it?
(author responds)
The Map was generated by the Seattle Times, it highlights eastern Washington as the land and lease holding rights are more accessible in those areas. The majority of thermal hot springs in Washington State are clustered along ridge lines within national parks or wilderness areas.
The majority of the lease enquiries by commercial and private real estate has been along or proximal to the Cascade crest. The concept goal here is to drill as close to the Volcano as possible.
As for the Eastern Washington resources these are mostly deep irrigation wells that have shown temperature gradients of interest (though shallow). Many of the Eastern Washington Resources would need significant core samples of depth to validate temperatures and flows.
Utlilities both public and private are looking at geothermal as part of their resource base. However the time is still 7-8 years before they anticipate geothermal coming on line. One question is the degree to which the utilities will engage developers and how.